PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

How much protein in grams do I need at 900 kcal a day?

Asked 22 Jun 2026Modified 2 days agoViewed 7k times
20

Scale weight, waist circumference and a repetition maximum, all logged weekly.

I have worked this out and I would like someone to find the error, because I suspect there is one.

My working so far, for the record, is below, and I am fairly sure the error is in the unit conversion rather than the algebra.

Is my approach right even if my number is wrong?

protein-intake
protein-intake

Protein targets in grams per kilogram, per-meal distribution and the leucine threshold, and the evidence for a higher intake specifically during…

60 questions
nutrition
nutrition

Eating on a suppressed appetite: hitting nutritional targets inside a small energy budget, micronutrient risk, meal structure, and what the trial…

100 questions
lean-mass
lean-mass

Lean body mass as measured rather than assumed: what DEXA, BIA and air-displacement plethysmography each actually estimate, the body-composition…

127 questions
shareeditfollowflag
EB
askedelke_brunner17k2822 Jun 2026
5Same machine both times? Otherwise the comparison is between machines. – claudia_ferrante 4 months ago
6Voting to keep this open — it is more specific than it first looks. – lyoph_cake 5 months ago
add a comment

5 Answers

Sorted by votes
25

Start with which body weight the target is calculated from, because using total weight in someone with substantial adiposity inflates the number without benefit.

Hydration requirements rise modestly with protein intake because urea excretion increases, which is a real effect and a small one.

Protein target arithmetic

Body mass1.2 g/kg1.6 g/kg2.0 g/kgPer meal at 1.6 (÷3)
62 kg74 g99 g124 g33 g
74 kg89 g118 g148 g39 g
88 kg106 g141 g176 g47 g
103 kg124 g165 g206 g55 g
124 kg149 g198 g248 g66 g

At roughly 4 kcal per gram, 141 g of protein is about 564 kcal — a substantial fraction of a 900 kcal budget, which is the real constraint.

Appetite suppression makes protein-rich foods harder to eat because they are satiating. Liquid protein and leaner, less voluminous sources are the usual practical workaround.

Research-use compounds are not approved for human use, and no supplement substitutes for total intake.

Per-meal saturation is real. One enormous serving does not do the job of three.

edited 28 Jul 2026 by rhian_prydderch — added the citation requested in comments

shareimprove this answerflag
RP
answeredrhian_prydderch23k2718 Jul 2026
3Confirming that maintaining load rather than adding it is the realistic goal in a deficit. – aine_mulcahy 2 months ago
4Does the protein target use total weight or reference weight? It changes it substantially. – s_bhattacharya 3 months ago
add a comment
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical - Independent Third-Party Testing

HPLC purity, identity confirmation and quantified content on the vial you actually hold. Reports arrive with the chromatogram attached, not just a number.

Submit a sample
Sponsored — paired listing

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. - Direct Synthesis

Founded 1998. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff and 200+ patents. The synthesis house behind a great many of the vials that get sent out for testing - batch-specific documentation with every order.

Visit GL Biochem
17

The underlying point is that protein is also the most satiating macronutrient per kilocalorie, which makes hitting the target easier than it sounds once it is prioritised.

Older adults need more per meal to overcome anabolic resistance, with 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg daily commonly quoted for maintenance and more in a deficit.

A practical construction: 30 to 40 grams at each of three meals plus a 20 to 30 gram snack covers most targets without any protein powder at all.

Stable-isotope feeding studies establish the per-meal saturation of muscle protein synthesis at around 0.4 g/kg in young adults and higher in older ones.

The caveat is that anyone with chronic kidney disease has a genuinely different protein calculation and needs it done by a clinician.

Plant-based patterns need a higher total and more attention per serving.

shareimprove this answerflag
AN
answeredamara_nwachukwu20k273 Jul 2026
3Small correction: lean mass on a scan is not muscle, which this says and people miss. – bac_or_bust 3 months ago
add a comment
11

The short version: total daily protein first, per-meal distribution second, timing a distant third.

The leucine threshold for triggering the response is around two and a half to three grams per meal. Thirty grams of most animal protein reaches it; thirty grams of many plant proteins does not, which is why plant-based targets run higher.

Use reference or adjusted body weight rather than total weight where adiposity is substantial: a common approach is ideal body weight plus a quarter of the excess, which avoids targets that no one could eat.

Leucine threshold effects are documented across protein sources and explain the difference in per-serving requirements between animal and plant proteins.

Plan protein first in the day; with suppressed appetite it will not happen otherwise.

shareimprove this answerflag
DC
answeredDr_Idris_Coulibaly33k13712 Jul 2026
8

Put another way, this is one of the better-evidenced areas in nutrition and the disagreements are about the top of the range, not the bottom.

Per meal, roughly 0.4 grams per kilogram saturates the synthetic response in most adults, which is about 30 to 40 grams for a typical person. Beyond that the surplus is oxidised or used for other purposes rather than adding to synthesis.

Systematic reviews of high-protein intake in people with normal renal function have not found evidence of harm to kidney function.

1.6 to 2.2 g/kg of reference weight, split three or four ways. That is the answer.

shareimprove this answerflag
FC
answeredforty_two_c66k5827 Jun 2026
-1

The honest answer is that most people in a deficit fall well short, and closing that gap matters more than any refinement above it.

High protein intakes do not damage healthy kidneys in the published evidence; existing kidney disease is a genuine exception and is a clinical question.

Meta-analytic estimates place the plateau of the dose-response for lean-mass retention with resistance training around 1.6 g/kg, with a confidence interval extending to about 2.2.

Nothing here is dietetic or medical advice.

Healthy kidneys tolerate this fine. Diseased ones are a clinical question.

shareimprove this answerflag
SL
answeredsian_llewellyn65k14727 Jul 2026

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.