PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

Is a 0.22 µm syringe filter worth using on a reconstituted research vial?

Asked 31 Jul 2024Modified 2.0 years agoViewed 16k times
32

This is the third vial from the same lot, so I can compare against two known-good ones.

I would like to know whether this claim survives contact with evidence.

If the answer is "nobody has tested that", I would like that stated so I can stop looking.

Is this actually true, and what is the evidence?

sterility
sterility

Sterility as a test result rather than an adjective. Covers what a sterility test actually measures, why "sterile filtered" on a document is close…

122 questionsreconstitution
reconstitution

Taking a lyophilised vial to a solution of known concentration: choice of diluent, volume selection, how to add liquid without shearing the cake,…

330 questionsharm-reduction
harm-reduction

Reducing avoidable risk where a decision has already been made: independent verification before use, sterility practice, dose arithmetic checked…

445 questions
shareeditfollowflag
CM
askedcarys_meredith17k2831 Jul 2024
3Any reason this would differ for a longer peptide? – lyoph_cake 7 months ago
add a comment

No answers yet

This question has not been answered. It has been viewed 16k times, which suggests the question is of interest and the answer is not obvious. If you can answer it with a source or a worked calculation, it will be read. See how to ask and answer.
Sponsored

PeptideMeter - Independent Peptide Analytics

Aggregated, published test results and vendor ratings built from submitted batches. Methodology stated, dataset browsable, no listing fees.

Browse results

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.