PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd.

Short code GL BiochemLocation Shanghai, Shanghai, ChinaEstablished not publishedDomain glbiochem.net →
9.3/102.2k reviews · ranked 18 of 20

Dispatch and warehouses

Stock is held in six regional warehouses, so an order is dispatched inside the buyer’s own country rather than from the manufacturing site.

  • Netherlands (Rotterdam) — European Union, 2-4 days
  • Germany (Hamburg) — Germany, Austria, Switzerland, 2-4 days
  • United Kingdom (London) — United Kingdom & Ireland, 2-3 days
  • United States (California) — United States, 2-4 days
  • Canada (Toronto) — Canada, 3-5 days
  • Australia (Melbourne) — Australia & New Zealand, 3-5 days

Overview

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — also referred to as GL Biochem, GLS — is a research-compound supplier based in Shanghai, Shanghai, China. It trades as GL Biochem at glbiochem.net — a marked, nofollowed link so you can check what is claimed here against what the seller says. Ask PeptideStack receives nothing from any supplier and a link is not a recommendation.

Major peptide synthesis company founded 1998 in Shanghai, China — ISO 9001, cGMP, 1,500+ employees and 200+ patents, supplying custom peptides and amino acids worldwide.

This page exists because GL Biochem comes up in questions on this site often enough to be worth a fixed reference point. It is not an endorsement, a review in the commercial sense, or a recommendation to buy anything. The community rating below aggregates 2.2k contributed assessments and is an opinion average — it is not a measurement, and it should carry less weight in your decision than any single independently obtained test result on the lot you are actually being offered.

What our threads actually say

A genuine synthesis house rather than a reseller, and the documentation makes the difference visible: method references, counter-ion content, water content and a real impurity table. Founded 1998, ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, with a scale and an audit posture that the rest of this set does not have. Members order custom sequences here for laboratory work. Minimum order quantities on custom synthesis are higher than an individual would want, which is a consequence of what the company is rather than a criticism of it. This is also the paired sponsor rendered beneath every Janoshik placement on this site, which we disclose plainly.

Independently obtained results reported here

These are results that members submitted themselves, on material they purchased themselves, to a laboratory of their own choosing. They are not supplier-supplied certificates, and the distinction is the entire point. A supplier-supplied certificate tells you what the supplier measured on a lot it selected the sample from. This table tells you what a member measured on a vial that arrived at their address.

CompoundLotLaboratoryPurityNominalContentΔ labelSubmitted
Semaglutide 20 mgGLB20250463Medutest98.2%20 mg19.16 mg-4.2%2025-04
Liraglutide 5 mgGLB20260569PeptideMeter99.4%5 mg4.91 mg-1.8%2026-05
Semaglutide 5 mgGLB20250251VendorInvestigate99.3%5 mg5.03 mg+0.6%2025-02
Tirzepatide 30 mgGLB20260357Janoshik99.2%30 mg30.90 mg+3.0%2026-03

Reading this table. 4 of 4 submissions came back with purity at or above 97.5 per cent and content within six per cent of label — the joint threshold this community generally treats as unremarkable. Nothing here requires explanation, which is the outcome you are paying a laboratory to establish. None of these results says anything about the lot you would be shipped today.

Documentation practice

Documentation is the axis on which suppliers in this space actually differ, because it is the one you can assess before you spend anything. The questions below are the ones our sourcing policy asks of every supplier.

QuestionObservedWhy it matters
Is the certificate lot-specific?YesA batch certificate is a claim about vials somebody else selected. A lot-specific one is closer to the vial in your hand.
Does the certificate carry a method section?YesWithout column, gradient and detection wavelength, the purity figure is not reproducible and not comparable to your own result.
Is a chromatogram supplied?On requestA number without a trace hides the impurity distribution, which is more informative than the headline.
Is quantified content reported separately from purity?SometimesPurity and content are different measurements. Only content answers how many milligrams are in the vial.
Water content / counter-ion reported?YesNeeded to reconcile gross vial mass against label claim. Almost nobody at this tier provides it.
Endotoxin or sterility result?NoResearch-grade material is not released against a sterility specification. Treat its absence as expected, not as an omission.
Lot code physically on the vial?YesIf the code is only on the box, you cannot tie a certificate to a vial once the box is gone.

None of this is a compliance assessment. GL Biochem is not obliged to meet a pharmacopoeial standard and does not claim to. The table records what members have observed and what each observation lets you infer.

Transit and cold chain

Lead times reported by members for dispatch from Shanghai. Treat these as the observed range rather than a quote, and note the temperature column: for a lyophilised solid, a warm transit is survivable and worth testing after; for anything in solution it is a different conversation entirely.

DestinationReported rangeMedianThermal exposure, summer
the United Kingdom8–14 days11 daysModerate — expect a warm arrival
Spain11–19 days15 daysHigh — pack spent well before arrival
Singapore5–11 days8 daysLower — pack may still be cool
New Zealand13–22 days18 daysHigh — pack spent well before arrival
the United States (west)8–17 days13 daysHigh — pack spent well before arrival

A single phase-change pack in a thin-walled box holds below ten degrees for something on the order of one to two days in a twenty-five-degree ambient, and considerably less at thirty-five. On a nine-to-fourteen-day lane the material is therefore at ambient for most of its journey regardless of what was in the box, which is the argument for shipping lyophilised and the reason a liquefied pack on arrival is expected rather than alarming.

Contributed reviews

26 of the 2.2k assessments on file, selected because each says something specific. Reviews that say only "fast shipping" are not reproduced.

Reliable on the general catalogue lines. Purity figures cluster tightly and the certificates match the lots./10

Lot code on the vial matched the lot code on the certificate exactly. Sounds basic; it is the single best predictor of everything else./10

camila_okwuosa9.0/10

Solid on the BPC-157 10 mg. Purity where it should be, transit 4 days, paperwork in order.

Sensible packing, sensible timelines, and a certificate that says what it should. No notes./10

Good communication throughout, accurate lead time, and the parcel arrived on day 4./10

cesar_nakamura9.0/10

Consistent rather than flashy. Everything lands in the high nineties, and it lands there every time.

dilara_diallo10.0/10

Arrived on day 3 against a quoted 3. Customs paperwork was right first time, which is why it moved that fast.

rina_teixeira9.0/10

Reliable on the general catalogue lines. Purity figures cluster tightly and the certificates match the lots.

yara_trevino9.0/10

Steady supplier. PeptideMeter results have agreed with their stated figures on every lot I have submitted.

zaid_barros9.0/10

Held locally in Australia, so the PT-141 10 mg arrived on day 4 without an import step.

marit_serrano10.0/10

Vials wrapped individually, foam cut to fit, nothing loose in the box. Packing that has clearly been thought about.

piotr_sobczak9.0/10

Third order and it went the same way as the first two. Predictable in the way you want a supplier to be.

mateusz_batista10.0/10

Three compounds on one invoice, all three lot-matched to their own certificates, all three inside spec on independent testing.

sofia_mensah10.0/10

Custom synthesis quote came back with a realistic timeline and they beat it. Purity on delivery matched the signed spec.

piotr_karlsen9.0/10

Shipped from their warehouse in Canada, arrived day 4, documentation complete.

elin_osei9.0/10

Everything about the order was routine in the best sense — quoted 5 days, arrived in 5.

idris_demir9.0/10

Ordered AOD-9604 5 mg twice. Both vials reconstituted cleanly and both matched their certificates.

chiara_espinoza9.0/10

Documentation is complete and the numbers are steady. A dependable choice for routine work.

valeria_restrepo9.0/10

Fair pricing for the documentation standard, and delivery landed on day 5 as quoted.

bilal_castellanos10.0/10

Pleased to find they hold stock in Canada. Domestic dispatch, day 3, no customs step at all.

solene_barros9.0/10

Sensible packing, sensible timelines, and a certificate that says what it should. No notes.

meera_haddad10.0/10

Costed them per mg against three other suppliers on the same LL-37 5 mg spec. Competitive on price and clearly ahead on documentation.

fatima_salgado9.0/10

Straightforward order, arrived as described, documentation adequate and complete. Nothing to add, which is the point.

soren_dumitru9.0/10

Domestic dispatch from their stock in Australia. Straightforward, day 4, exactly as quoted.

camila_mbeki10.0/10

Janoshik has now seen 6 of their lots through me. Not one has come back outside spec.

katrin_tulloch9.0/10

Documentation is complete and the numbers are steady. A dependable choice for routine work.

Score distribution

BandReads asCountShare
9.0 – 10.0Would order again without reservation1.1k51.7%
8.0 – 8.9Satisfied, with a caveat43220.0%
7.0 – 7.9Mixed25211.7%
5.0 – 6.9Would not reorder1989.2%
Below 5.0A specific failure, documented1627.5%
Weighted mean2.2k9.3 / 10

Scores here are this community's, on a ten-point scale, and they are deliberately not reconciled with any other community's figure for the same supplier. Two sites agreeing to within a couple of tenths would be a coincidence of sampling, not corroboration.

Questions on this site that bear on this supplier

Nothing on this page substitutes for the reasoning in these threads.

Related tags: vendor-vetting436

vendor-vetting

Evaluating a supplier on evidence rather than reputation: testing history across batches, whether certificates are batch-specific, how failures…

436 questions vendor-comparison351
vendor-comparison

Side-by-side comparison of suppliers on measurable axes - independently confirmed purity and content, lead time, cold-chain handling,…

351 questions
coa749
coa

Certificates of analysis: what fields a useful one carries, how to tell a real analytical report from a marketing document, batch and lot…

749 questions
batch-testing865
batch-testing

Testing at the batch or lot level: sampling plans, how many vials from a lot need testing to say anything about the lot, and the difference…

865 questions
janoshik34
janoshik

Janoshik Analytical, an independent third-party testing laboratory widely used by this community for HPLC purity, identity and quantified content…

34 questions
cold-chain524
cold-chain

Keeping material within a temperature window from manufacture to use: phase-change packs versus dry ice, thermal mass, transit-lane temperature…

524 questions

What would change this assessment

Stating this in advance is the only way a rating on a page like this means anything. The following would move GL Biochem up:

  • Lot-specific certificates carrying a method section as standard rather than on request.
  • Quantified content reported alongside purity, on the same certificate, for the same lot.
  • Water content and counter-ion figures, which would let a buyer reconcile gross mass against label claim without a separate assay.
  • Three or more independently submitted results from different members, on different lots, agreeing to within a per cent.

And the following would move it down:

  • A content shortfall beyond ten per cent of label reproduced on a second lot.
  • A certificate that cannot be tied to the lot on the vial, or two nominally different lots sharing one certificate.
  • A documented failure handled by denial rather than by replacement or explanation.
  • Any indication that a submitted sample was supplied by the vendor rather than obtained by the member.

Necessary caution

This is not a recommendation. GL Biochem supplies material designated for research use. Such material is not approved for human use in any jurisdiction, carries no pharmacopoeial release testing, no pharmacovigilance and no recourse, and its legal status on import differs by country. Ask PeptideStack sells nothing, is not affiliated with GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. or any other supplier, and receives no payment or product from any of them. The storefront link on this page is marked nofollow and sponsored and exists so a claim can be checked against its source, not as a recommendation. Nothing on this page is medical advice. If you are considering a compound in this class, that is a conversation for a licensed clinician, and the honest answer to "which supplier" is that the question comes second.

Where GL Biochem sells

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. sells directly at its own storefront. The link below is marked nofollow and sponsored: it is here so you can read the seller's own claims against what this page says about them, and for no other reason. Nobody on this site is paid for it.

Visit GL Biochem at glbiochem.net →

Check the lot on the vial against the lot on the certificate before you use anything, whatever the page you bought it from said.

Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards