PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

Why does dimerisation accelerate at minus 80 °C rather than proceeding linearly?

Asked 9 Apr 2024Modified 2.1 years agoViewed 42k times
36

What I am working with: dimerisation · minus 80 °C.

The empirical answer seems settled. The explanation does not.

If the honest answer is that nobody knows, I would rather hear that than a plausible story.

What is the causal chain, and where does it stop being established?

peptide-stability
peptide-stability

The chemistry of peptide degradation: deamidation, oxidation, hydrolysis, aggregation and fibrillation, and how temperature, pH, ionic strength,…

908 questions
storage
storage

Storage conditions and their evidence base: minus twenty degrees for powder, refrigerated for solution, protection from light, and what the…

701 questions
hplc
hplc

Reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography, the workhorse purity method. Column chemistry, mobile-phase choice, gradient slope,…

503 questions
shareeditfollowflag
SC
askedstopper_core28k1279 Apr 2024
Same question here after a warm delivery, so I am following this. – anders_vestby 4 months ago
2Worth saying whether the vial has been opened, because that starts a different clock. – p_mkhize 6 months ago
add a comment

5 Answers

Accepted answer first, then by votes
24

Accepted answer

Because temperature enters the rate constant through an exponential, so equal steps in temperature multiply the rate instead of adding to it. Arrhenius puts the rate proportional to exp(−Ea/RT); the working approximation is a doubling per 10 K, which takes 5, 15, 25 and 35 °C to multipliers of 1, 2, 4 and 8. The steps in temperature are equal and the steps in rate are not, and that is the whole of the observation. At minus 80 °C the same rule gives no useful multiplier at all, because below freezing the reaction is no longer happening in bulk solution. Two chains join, usually through a disulfide, so the product is roughly twice the mass and shows up as a late peak — or as nothing, if it never comes off the column. Ea differs by route, so the ranking of routes changes with temperature too — which is why accelerated data extrapolates badly and why nobody should read a 40 °C study as a fast version of a 5 °C one.

Start with the sequence, because which pathways are available depends on which residues are present.

Light exposure matters for tryptophan-containing sequences and for anything with a chromophore. Amber vials and a closed box are free mitigations.

Reported and extrapolated stability by condition

StateConditionUsable windowBasis
Lyophilised solid−20 °C, sealed, dry24–36 monthsSupplier guidance
Lyophilised solid2–8 °C, sealed12–24 monthsSupplier guidance
Lyophilised solid25 °C, sealed4–8 weeksExtrapolated (Arrhenius)
Lyophilised solid40 °C, sealed1–2 weeksExtrapolated
Solution, preserved2–8 °C28 daysUSP microbiological convention
Solution, preserved25 °C3–7 daysExtrapolated
Solution, unpreserved2–8 °C24 hoursUSP microbiological convention

Windows for the solid state are chemical; windows for solution are microbiological and usually shorter than the chemical limit.

Freeze-thaw cycling drives aggregation through concentration at the ice interface and pH shifts as buffer components crystallise out at different rates. Each cycle costs something.

Aggregation at air-liquid interfaces is established from surface-tension and particle-count studies and is the basis for anti-agitation handling guidance.

Apparent loss in a dilute preparation is usually adsorption rather than degradation and is worth ruling out first.

Sequence decides which pathways are even available. Check the residues.

shareimprove this answerflag
LC
answered · acceptedlyoph_cake78k26714 Jun 2024
2Worth adding that residual moisture predicts this better than any printed date. – tenth_of_a_unit 9 months ago
add a comment
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards
22

The short version: water enables most of it, oxygen enables oxidation, surfaces enable adsorption, and agitation enables aggregation.

Oxidation targets methionine, cysteine and tryptophan, adding sixteen daltons per oxygen. It is catalysed by trace metals and promoted by dissolved oxygen and by light.

A mass spectrum resolves most of this: minus eighteen is dehydration or succinimide, plus one is deamidation, plus sixteen is oxidation, and an unchanged mass with a shifted retention time is an isomer.

The caveat is that none of these pathways can be seen by looking at a vial, and a clear solution can be substantially degraded.

A mass spectrum names the pathway. Plus one, plus sixteen, minus eighteen.

shareimprove this answerflag
HN
answeredhalvard_ness69k473 Jun 2024
13

Answering this needs the physical state, since a dry powder is protected from most of these and a solution is protected from none.

Aggregation is physical: peptides unfold at air-liquid interfaces and associate. Shaking maximises that interface, which is why swirling and shaking produce visibly different outcomes on the same vial.

Worth being precise here: deamidation converts asparagine or glutamine to the corresponding acid via a succinimide intermediate, adding one dalton. It is base-catalysed, accelerates above neutral pH and is the dominant aqueous pathway for many peptides.

Adsorption losses at low concentrations are quantified in formulation studies and are the reason carrier proteins are used in dilute preparations.

At dilute concentrations, suspect adsorption before you suspect chemistry.

edited 8 Jul 2024 by marta_okonkwo — fixed an arithmetic slip in the third paragraph

shareimprove this answerflag
MO
answeredmarta_okonkwo190k25825 Jun 2024
The desiccant point is under-appreciated and costs nothing to act on. – bea_castellanos 4 months ago
Does the same reasoning apply to material already in solution, or is that a different curve? – Dr_Rosalind_Achebe 5 months ago
add a comment
10

This is answerable from the chemistry rather than from anecdote, which is unusual and welcome.

Adsorption onto glass and plastic is significant at low concentrations — micrograms per millilitre — and negligible at milligrams per millilitre. It is the usual explanation for an apparent loss in a dilute preparation.

Metal-catalysed oxidation of methionine is documented across peptide and protein formulations and is why chelators appear in some formulations.

Cold, dry, dark, still. Those four words cover most of the mitigation.

shareimprove this answerflag
TA
answeredtess_amankwah22k2720 Apr 2024
2I have kept vials both ways for a year and this matches what I saw. – bufferline42 9 months ago
Two lots stored differently, reassayed at a year — the difference was smaller than I expected. – leah_ferrers 7 months ago
add a comment
10

The relevant point is that a mass shift of plus one dalton is deamidation and plus sixteen is oxidation, so degradation is often visible in a mass spectrum if anyone looks.

Hydrolysis cleaves the backbone, most readily at aspartate-proline and aspartate-glycine sequences, and is acid-catalysed. In a dry solid it barely proceeds at all.

Deamidation via the succinimide intermediate is well characterised, with sequence-dependent rates highest for asparagine-glycine motifs.

Swirl, never shake. Aggregation is a handling problem more than a time problem.

shareimprove this answerflag
BU
answeredbufferline4230k1386 Jul 2024
6The doubling-per-ten-degrees rule is the part I did not know and now use constantly. – rhian_prydderch 8 months ago
add a comment

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.