The safety question for this limb is glycaemic rather than gastrointestinal, which is a different monitoring problem.
Amino-acid handling changes too: glucagon drives hepatic ureagenesis, so the liver–alpha-cell axis is part of the picture and shows up as changes in circulating amino acids.
Because the mechanism is partly independent of appetite, the weight loss is less strongly coupled to reported food intake, which makes the trial data harder to interpret rather than easier.
The liver–alpha-cell axis linking glucagon signalling to hepatic amino-acid metabolism is well described and predicts the amino-acid changes seen with these agents.
The caveat is that the glycaemic penalty is real and the balance between limbs is not something anyone can reason about from outside a dose-ranging trial.
Expect a slightly larger heart-rate effect than with a pure GLP-1 agonist.
2Thank you for naming the trial programme. Half the confusion on this site is citation drift. – Dr_Ilse_Vandenberg 8 months ago add a comment