PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

How much protein in grams do I need at 112 kg on 900 kcal a day?

Asked 25 Feb 2025Modified 13 months agoViewed 27k times
19

Conditions: 112 kg · 900 kcal.

I want the working, not the result — I need to be able to redo it with different numbers.

I care about the precision as well as the value — I want to know how many figures are real.

Where is my error, and what is the correct working?

protein-intake
protein-intake

Protein targets in grams per kilogram, per-meal distribution and the leucine threshold, and the evidence for a higher intake specifically during…

60 questions
nutrition
nutrition

Eating on a suppressed appetite: hitting nutritional targets inside a small energy budget, micronutrient risk, meal structure, and what the trial…

100 questions
lean-mass
lean-mass

Lean body mass as measured rather than assumed: what DEXA, BIA and air-displacement plethysmography each actually estimate, the body-composition…

127 questions
shareeditfollowflag
WC
askedwren_calloway23k3825 Feb 2025
3How long has it been flat? Under four weeks and it is probably not a plateau. – g_paskevicius 6 months ago
4Add the protein intake in grams rather than as a percentage. – ines_brandt 8 months ago
add a comment

5 Answers

Accepted answer first, then by votes
62

Accepted answer

179 to 246 g a day. The range the resistance-training literature supports is 1.6 to 2.2 g per kilogram, which at 112 kg is 179–246 g. At 4 kcal per gram that is 717–986 kcal, or 80–110 per cent of a 900 intake — which is why protein has to be planned first at this energy level rather than fitted in afterwards. Split it across three or four servings; roughly 0.4 g/kg per meal saturates the synthetic response and the surplus in one large serving does not carry over.

More usefully, this is one of the better-evidenced areas in nutrition and the disagreements are about the top of the range, not the bottom.

A practical construction: 30 to 40 grams at each of three meals plus a 20 to 30 gram snack covers most targets without any protein powder at all.

The leucine threshold for triggering the response is around two and a half to three grams per meal. Thirty grams of most animal protein reaches it; thirty grams of many plant proteins does not, which is why plant-based targets run higher.

Stable-isotope feeding studies establish the per-meal saturation of muscle protein synthesis at around 0.4 g/kg in young adults and higher in older ones.

Plan protein first in the day; with suppressed appetite it will not happen otherwise.

shareimprove this answerflag
RP
answered · acceptedrhian_prydderch23k2726 May 2025
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical - Independent Third-Party Testing

HPLC purity, identity confirmation and quantified content on the vial you actually hold. Reports arrive with the chromatogram attached, not just a number.

Submit a sample
Sponsored — paired listing

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. - Direct Synthesis

Founded 1998. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff and 200+ patents. The synthesis house behind a great many of the vials that get sent out for testing - batch-specific documentation with every order.

Visit GL Biochem
74

Answer first: aim for 1.6 to 2.2 grams per kilogram of reference body weight per day, distributed across three or four servings, and treat it as the first constraint on the day rather than the last.

Older adults need more per meal to overcome anabolic resistance, with 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg daily commonly quoted for maintenance and more in a deficit.

Appetite suppression makes protein-rich foods harder to eat because they are satiating. Liquid protein and leaner, less voluminous sources are the usual practical workaround.

Leucine threshold effects are documented across protein sources and explain the difference in per-serving requirements between animal and plant proteins.

Nothing here is dietetic or medical advice.

1.6 to 2.2 g/kg of reference weight, split three or four ways. That is the answer.

edited 21 Jun 2025 by sian_llewellyn — fixed an arithmetic slip in the third paragraph

shareimprove this answerflag
SL
answeredsian_llewellyn65k14717 Jun 2025
2Worth adding that scan precision means half a kilogram is inside the noise. – tandem_gradient 6 months ago
Any published number for how long the counter-regulatory response persists? – n_takahashi 5 months ago
add a comment
49

More usefully, plant-based patterns need somewhat higher totals and more attention to leucine content per serving to produce an equivalent response.

Per meal, roughly 0.4 grams per kilogram saturates the synthetic response in most adults, which is about 30 to 40 grams for a typical person. Beyond that the surplus is oxidised or used for other purposes rather than adding to synthesis.

High protein intakes do not damage healthy kidneys in the published evidence; existing kidney disease is a genuine exception and is a clinical question.

Targets are population estimates; individual requirements vary and there is no cheap way to measure yours.

Healthy kidneys tolerate this fine. Diseased ones are a clinical question.

shareimprove this answerflag
DA
answeredDr_Yusuf_Adeyemi54k14728 Feb 2025
8Two of us ran the numbers on this and got the same lean fraction, for what that is worth. – swirl_dont_shake 9 months ago
add a comment
29

The honest answer is that most people in a deficit fall well short, and closing that gap matters more than any refinement above it.

Hydration requirements rise modestly with protein intake because urea excretion increases, which is a real effect and a small one.

Meta-analytic estimates place the plateau of the dose-response for lean-mass retention with resistance training around 1.6 g/kg, with a confidence interval extending to about 2.2.

Per-meal saturation is real. One enormous serving does not do the job of three.

shareimprove this answerflag
RC
answeredRP_C18105k3486 Jun 2025
4The glycogen-water point explains a fortnight of confusion I had two years ago. – Dr_Sara_Kuusela 2 months ago
add a comment
27

Start with which body weight the target is calculated from, because using total weight in someone with substantial adiposity inflates the number without benefit.

Use reference or adjusted body weight rather than total weight where adiposity is substantial: a common approach is ideal body weight plus a quarter of the excess, which avoids targets that no one could eat.

Plant-based patterns need a higher total and more attention per serving.

shareimprove this answerflag
AL
answereda_lindgren58k2484 May 2025

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.