PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

How long does dulaglutide stay within specification at 37 °C once reconstituted?

Asked 16 Jun 2024Modified 22 months agoViewed 35k times
27

What I am working with: dulaglutide · 37 °C.

This is a procedural question rather than a theoretical one, and I would like the procedure rather than the theory.

What I have done so far is read the label documentation where it exists and the two pharmacopoeial monographs that are publicly available, which cover the licensed presentation and say nothing about a research one.

What does a defensible version of this look like in practice?

peptide-stability
peptide-stability

The chemistry of peptide degradation: deamidation, oxidation, hydrolysis, aggregation and fibrillation, and how temperature, pH, ionic strength,…

908 questions
storage
storage

Storage conditions and their evidence base: minus twenty degrees for powder, refrigerated for solution, protection from light, and what the…

701 questions
shelf-life
shelf-life

How long a preparation remains within specification: labelled expiry for a sealed lyophilised vial, beyond-use dating after reconstitution, and…

327 questions
dulaglutide
dulaglutide

A once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist built on an Fc fusion rather than fatty-acid acylation. Use this tag for questions about the fusion-protein…

200 questions
shareeditfollowflag
FC
askedforty_two_c66k5816 Jun 2024
8Is there a printed date on the vial, and do you know what it was derived from? – lukas_sedlacek 8 months ago
7Voting to keep this open — it is more specific than it first looks. – plate_count_9k 7 months ago
add a comment

5 Answers

Accepted answer first, then by votes
51

Accepted answer

Whatever the refrigerated figure is, divide it by about 9.2. 37 °C is 32 kelvin above the 5 °C middle of a 2–8 °C refrigerator. The ten-degree rule of thumb — degradation rate roughly doubling per 10 K — makes that about 9.2 times the refrigerated rate, which is an order-of-magnitude statement and not a shelf life. So a preparation with a twenty-eight day refrigerated figure has roughly 3 days at 37 °C on the same assumption — an order-of-magnitude answer, not a shelf life, and it says nothing about sterility, which has its own clock. "Within specification" also needs a specification: purity, content, or both, and at what limit. Without that the question has no numerical answer at all.

Start with the sequence, because which pathways are available depends on which residues are present.

Aggregation is physical: peptides unfold at air-liquid interfaces and associate. Shaking maximises that interface, which is why swirling and shaking produce visibly different outcomes on the same vial.

Reported and extrapolated stability by condition

StateConditionUsable windowBasis
Lyophilised solid−20 °C, sealed, dry24–36 monthsSupplier guidance
Lyophilised solid2–8 °C, sealed12–24 monthsSupplier guidance
Lyophilised solid25 °C, sealed4–8 weeksExtrapolated (Arrhenius)
Lyophilised solid40 °C, sealed1–2 weeksExtrapolated
Solution, preserved2–8 °C28 daysUSP microbiological convention
Solution, preserved25 °C3–7 daysExtrapolated
Solution, unpreserved2–8 °C24 hoursUSP microbiological convention

Windows for the solid state are chemical; windows for solution are microbiological and usually shorter than the chemical limit.

Mechanically, deamidation converts asparagine or glutamine to the corresponding acid via a succinimide intermediate, adding one dalton. It is base-catalysed, accelerates above neutral pH and is the dominant aqueous pathway for many peptides.

Aggregation at air-liquid interfaces is established from surface-tension and particle-count studies and is the basis for anti-agitation handling guidance.

Nothing here is medical advice, and research-use compounds are not approved for human use.

Swirl, never shake. Aggregation is a handling problem more than a time problem.

edited 16 Aug 2024 by esben_lykke — updated for the 2026 guidance change

shareimprove this answerflag
EL
answered · acceptedesben_lykke84k15816 Aug 2024
2This should be linked from the help pages. – tare_and_weigh 7 months ago
I have kept vials both ways for a year and this matches what I saw. – Dr_Hanne_Solberg 5 months ago
add a comment
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards
16

The short version: water enables most of it, oxygen enables oxidation, surfaces enable adsorption, and agitation enables aggregation.

Adsorption onto glass and plastic is significant at low concentrations — micrograms per millilitre — and negligible at milligrams per millilitre. It is the usual explanation for an apparent loss in a dilute preparation.

A mass spectrum resolves most of this: minus eighteen is dehydration or succinimide, plus one is deamidation, plus sixteen is oxidation, and an unchanged mass with a shifted retention time is an isomer.

Adsorption losses at low concentrations are quantified in formulation studies and are the reason carrier proteins are used in dilute preparations.

Apparent loss in a dilute preparation is usually adsorption rather than degradation and is worth ruling out first.

At dilute concentrations, suspect adsorption before you suspect chemistry.

shareimprove this answerflag
MO
answeredmarta_okonkwo190k2587 Sept 2024
7Small correction: it is the number of cycles rather than the freezer temperature that does the damage. – tobias_maartens 8 months ago
8Same experience here, different supplier. – liam_bracken 1 days ago
add a comment
13

Asparagine and glutamine are the deamidation risk, and methionine is the oxidation risk.

Oxidation targets methionine, cysteine and tryptophan, adding sixteen daltons per oxygen. It is catalysed by trace metals and promoted by dissolved oxygen and by light.

Concretely, hydrolysis cleaves the backbone, most readily at aspartate-proline and aspartate-glycine sequences, and is acid-catalysed. In a dry solid it barely proceeds at all.

The caveat is that none of these pathways can be seen by looking at a vial, and a clear solution can be substantially degraded.

Sequence decides which pathways are even available. Check the residues.

shareimprove this answerflag
HN
answeredhalvard_ness69k4718 Sept 2024
8

Answer first: the degradation pathways worth knowing are hydrolysis, deamidation, oxidation, aggregation and adsorption, and each has a different trigger and a different mitigation.

Freeze-thaw cycling drives aggregation through concentration at the ice interface and pH shifts as buffer components crystallise out at different rates. Each cycle costs something.

Metal-catalysed oxidation of methionine is documented across peptide and protein formulations and is why chelators appear in some formulations.

Sequence determines which pathways apply, so general statements are general.

Cold, dry, dark, still. Those four words cover most of the mitigation.

shareimprove this answerflag
AL
answereda_lindgren58k24830 Sept 2024
-1

Answering this needs the physical state, since a dry powder is protected from most of these and a solution is protected from none.

Light exposure matters for tryptophan-containing sequences and for anything with a chromophore. Amber vials and a closed box are free mitigations.

Deamidation via the succinimide intermediate is well characterised, with sequence-dependent rates highest for asparagine-glycine motifs.

The caveat is that "within specification" and "unchanged" are different claims. A vial can lose a few per cent of content and still be usable for its purpose while no longer matching its certificate.

A mass spectrum names the pathway. Plus one, plus sixteen, minus eighteen.

edited 15 Sept 2024 by orla_sheridan — tightened the wording; no substantive change

shareimprove this answerflag
OS
answeredorla_sheridan18k2727 Aug 2024
3Adding a vote because this deserves more of them. – tenth_of_a_unit 29 days ago
add a comment

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.