Page 4 of 8 · 186 questions tagged customs.
What I am working with: Guangzhou · the United States. I would like help reading this properly rather than being told what conclusion to reach. I have the full report…
Numbers first: Tianjin · Poland. I can parse the result. I am less sure what it licenses me to conclude. I have deliberately not looked at anyone else’s…
Concretely: Xianning · Japan. I would like to know the limits of what can be inferred from this. What I am trying to avoid is over-reading a single result, which I…
What I have: Hangzhou · Singapore. This is presented as though it settles something, and I am not convinced it does. I have two documents that appear to disagree,…
Numbers first: Qingdao · Singapore. This is presented as though it settles something, and I am not convinced it does. I have two documents that appear to disagree,…
What I am working with: Shanghai · the United States. I would like help reading this properly rather than being told what conclusion to reach. I have the full report…
The lane and the lead time matter as much as the material for what I am doing. This is presented as though it settles something, and I am not convinced it does. I…
Setup, so nobody has to ask: Suzhou · Sweden. I have read the primary source rather than the summary, which has left me with more questions. I understand the…
Concretely: Suzhou · Australia. The figures are clear enough; the question is what they mean and what they do not. I can supply the numbers if the specifics change…
Stated plainly: Nantong · Canada. I would like help reading this properly rather than being told what conclusion to reach. I have the full report including the method…
Details up front: Wuxi · the United Kingdom. This is presented as though it settles something, and I am not convinced it does. I have two documents that appear to…
Details up front: Wuxi · Ireland. I can parse the result. I am less sure what it licenses me to conclude. I have deliberately not looked at anyone else’s…
The case in front of me: Suzhou · Norway. The figures are clear enough; the question is what they mean and what they do not. I can supply the numbers if the specifics…
Concretely: Wuhan · Germany. I would like to know the limits of what can be inferred from this. What I am trying to avoid is over-reading a single result, which I…
What I have: Hangzhou · Ireland. I can parse the result. I am less sure what it licenses me to conclude. I have deliberately not looked at anyone else’s…
Conditions: Wuhan · Australia. The figures are clear enough; the question is what they mean and what they do not. I can supply the numbers if the specifics change the…
What I am working with: Suzhou · Sweden. I have read the primary source rather than the summary, which has left me with more questions. I understand the headline. I…
Concretely: Xianning · Norway. The figures are clear enough; the question is what they mean and what they do not. I can supply the numbers if the specifics change the…
Details up front: Canada · five days. Before I write this off, I want to check whether it is a known failure mode. I have the lot number, the certificate and the…
The case in front of me: Guangzhou · Japan. I would like to know the limits of what can be inferred from this. What I am trying to avoid is over-reading a single…
The specifics, since they change the answer: Qingdao · Finland. I have the document in front of me and I can read the numbers. What I cannot do is interpret them. I…
What I am working with: Poland · fourteen days. I noticed this today and I have not touched anything since, in case the state is diagnostic. I have not discarded…
Two parcels, same origin, same declared contents, three weeks apart. One cleared in 40 hours. The other has been sitting at an international sorting facility for…
For reference: Changsha · South Africa. I want to understand what this actually establishes, as opposed to what it is being used to imply. My concern is that I am…