11
The method section is present, which is unusual enough that I want to make use of it.
I have read the primary source rather than the summary, which has left me with more questions.
I understand the headline. I do not understand the footnotes, and the footnotes look important.
How should I read this, and where are the traps?
shareeditfollowflag
3For what it is worth, my own result was within half a per cent of this. – gradient_slope 3 months ago
2Any reason this would differ for a longer peptide? – nkem_obiora 30 days ago
add a comment