Accepted answer
Ten days at 25 °C is about 40 refrigerated days of equivalent exposure. 25 °C is 20 kelvin above the 5 °C middle of a 2–8 °C refrigerator. The ten-degree rule of thumb — degradation rate roughly doubling per 10 K — makes that about 4 times the refrigerated rate, which is an order-of-magnitude statement and not a shelf life. At 40 equivalent days a test is more likely to reassure you than to tell you something, which is a legitimate reason to run it and a poor reason to expect a finding. Either way, record the ten days and the temperature now, while you still know them; an excursion you did not write down is an excursion you cannot interpret later.
The relevant detail is that this is where the anxiety in this hobby is most out of proportion to the chemistry.
That is the argument for shipping lyophilised rather than for shipping colder. A dry powder with low residual moisture is stable at ambient for months; the pathways that matter need water.
It helps to be literal here: asking a supplier to hold a shipment during a heatwave is reasonable and the better ones agree; the cost is a week and the benefit is a shorter warm exposure for anything in solution.
Arrhenius kinetics predict approximately a doubling of degradation rate per ten-degree rise and are the standard basis for cold-chain design.
A liquefied pack is expected. It is not evidence of a problem.
6I would add a sentence about light, since tryptophan-containing sequences care. – Dr_Jonas_Halvorsen 2 months ago 7Does the same reasoning apply to material already in solution, or is that a different curve? – e_dziedzic 4 months ago add a comment