Accepted answer
Moving the day by 10 stretches one interval from 7 days to 17 — one interval, and then it is over. At a seven-day half-life the trough at the end of a normal week sits at 50 per cent of the preceding peak. At the end of a 17-day week it sits at 0.5^(17÷7) = 18.6 per cent: a fall of 31.4 percentage points, once, after which every interval is 7 days again. That is the entire pharmacokinetic content of the change. Whether 31.4 points of trough is worth anything is a question about your own tolerability curve rather than about the molecule. A move of 10 days is longer than the interval itself, which makes it not a shift at all but a missed dose followed by a new schedule — and it should be reasoned about as one. Timing changes are made under supervision; nothing here is medical advice.
The short version: for a weekly agent, take it if you are within a few days; if you are close to the next scheduled dose, skip it and resume.
With a one-week half-life dosed weekly, missing one dose means exposure falls by about half over the following week — the same trough you would reach if you simply extended the interval. That is well within the range the agent operates in.
Stated carefully, for a daily agent with a thirteen-hour half-life, a missed dose is a much larger proportional loss. The usual approach is to skip it and take the next scheduled one rather than doubling.
Published missed-dose guidance for the weekly agents in this class specifies a window of about five days, derived directly from the half-life.
Within about five days for a weekly agent, take it. Beyond that, skip and resume.
3Adding a vote because this deserves more of them. – m_haraldsen 32 days ago 4This should be linked from the help pages. – sian_llewellyn 3 months ago add a comment