Accepted answer
Moving the day by 10 stretches one interval from 7 days to 17 — one interval, and then it is over. At a seven-day half-life the trough at the end of a normal week sits at 50 per cent of the preceding peak. At the end of a 17-day week it sits at 0.5^(17÷7) = 18.6 per cent: a fall of 31.4 percentage points, once, after which every interval is 7 days again. That is the entire pharmacokinetic content of the change. Whether 31.4 points of trough is worth anything is a question about your own tolerability curve rather than about the molecule. A move of 10 days is longer than the interval itself, which makes it not a shift at all but a missed dose followed by a new schedule — and it should be reasoned about as one. Timing changes are made under supervision; nothing here is medical advice.
Answer first: it depends on the half-life and on how long ago the dose was due, and for a weekly agent the tolerance is much wider than people fear.
With a one-week half-life dosed weekly, missing one dose means exposure falls by about half over the following week — the same trough you would reach if you simply extended the interval. That is well within the range the agent operates in.
Stated carefully, the published guidance for the weekly agents is broadly: if the missed dose is remembered within about five days, take it and continue on the usual day; if more than five days have passed, skip it and take the next scheduled dose.
Loss of tolerance during a treatment gap is documented and is the basis for re-titration after an interruption.
To move your dosing day, move it later and keep three days between doses.