Accepted answer
Answer first: for a lyophilised solid the cold chain matters far less than people believe, and for a solution it matters far more than they act as though it does.
Arrhenius behaviour means the degradation rate roughly doubles per ten degrees. A week at thirty degrees is therefore a meaningful exposure for a solution and an immaterial one for a dry solid.
Degradation pathway by condition
| Pathway | Dominant when | Detected by |
|---|
| Deamidation | Solution, neutral to alkaline pH | RP-HPLC, +1 Da on MS |
| Oxidation | Light, trace metals, peroxides | RP-HPLC, +16 Da on MS |
| Hydrolysis | Solution, extremes of pH | RP-HPLC, fragment masses |
| Aggregation | Agitation, interfaces, high concentration | SEC, visual haze; often invisible on RP-HPLC |
| Freeze-concentration damage | Freeze-thaw of buffered solution | SEC, loss of recovered content |
Asking a supplier to hold a shipment during a heatwave is reasonable and the better ones agree; the cost is a week and the benefit is a shorter warm exposure for anything in solution.
Phase-change pack hold time is a function of mass, latent heat and insulation, and published figures for small parcels are on the order of one to two days.
The caveat is that a warm transit is survivable for a solid and materially different for a solution.
Lyophilised tolerates the lane. That is the answer for almost every order.
edited 27 Apr 2026 by lane_transit — clarified the distinction between purity and content
2Is there a reason to prefer minus eighty here, or is minus twenty genuinely enough? – sian_llewellyn 2 months ago add a comment