PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

Is a 96.4% result from Janoshik comparable to 97.6% from Medutest?

Asked 31 Dec 2025Modified 5 months agoViewed 3.5k times
4

Details up front: 96.4% · Janoshik · 97.6% · Medutest.

I want to know what the trade-off actually is rather than which option is fashionable.

I would rather have a defensible reason than a marginal improvement.

Which axes does this decision turn on?

purity
purity

Purity as chromatographic area per cent - the fraction of detected material that is your target peak. It says nothing about how much material is…

788 questions
batch-testing
batch-testing

Testing at the batch or lot level: sampling plans, how many vials from a lot need testing to say anything about the lot, and the difference…

865 questions
reference-standard
reference-standard

Certified reference materials and in-house standards: traceability, the certificate of the standard itself, system suitability, and why every…

179 questions
shareeditfollowflag
NT
askednominal_ten14k1731 Dec 2025

1 Answer

Sorted by votes
3

Mechanically, start from what the detector sees, because that tells you what the number means.

Retention time is sequence-specific and method-specific, so comparing your result to a supplier value using a different method is meaningless without method documentation.

Column pore size affects mass transfer — a 100 Angstrom packing on a 5 kDa peptide restricts diffusion, broadening the peak and potentially hiding small impurities in the shoulders.

Published side-by-side method comparisons show that a two-point difference in purity on the same vial is easily explained by method choice alone.

The practical summary: ask for the chromatogram and the method, and ignore the headline number until you have both.

shareimprove this answerflag
LT
answeredlane_transit42k384 Mar 2026
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.