PeptideStack
5.2kquestions
20kanswers
220users

Is a 95.2% result from Janoshik comparable to 97.6% from Medutest?

Asked 30 Sept 2025Modified 10 months agoViewed 14k times
28

Details up front: 95.2% · Janoshik · 97.6% · Medutest.

I have used one of these for a while and I am considering switching, which requires a reason.

What I care about is reproducibility, because a result I cannot repeat is not useful to me.

What does each option buy me, and what does it cost me?

purity
purity

Purity as chromatographic area per cent - the fraction of detected material that is your target peak. It says nothing about how much material is…

833 questionsbatch-testing
batch-testing

Testing at the batch or lot level: sampling plans, how many vials from a lot need testing to say anything about the lot, and the difference…

910 questionsreference-standard
reference-standard

Certified reference materials and in-house standards: traceability, the certificate of the standard itself, system suitability, and why every…

185 questionsjanoshik
janoshik

Janoshik Analytical, an independent third-party testing laboratory widely used by this community for HPLC purity, identity and quantified content…

139 questionsmedutest
medutest

Medutest, one of four independent testing and verification services referenced throughout this site. Use this tag for its methods, its report…

126 questions
shareeditfollowflag
TH
askedtyndall_haze38k3830 Sept 2025

No answers yet

This question has not been answered. It has been viewed 14k times, which suggests the question is of interest and the answer is not obvious. If you can answer it with a source or a worked calculation, it will be read. See how to ask and answer.
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich - Certified Reference Materials

Analytical standards and reagents with traceable certificates. Every quantitative result you read inherits the accuracy of the standard behind it.

Shop standards

Your answer

Ask PeptideStack is a static archive. Posting is closed, but the norms are worth stating: answer the question that was asked, show your working, cite the trial or the certificate, and say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Not medical advice. Research-use-only compounds are not approved for human use.