Accepted answer
Start with which counter-ion the process produced, because trifluoroacetate from reverse-phase purification and acetate from a salt exchange behave differently and are quantified differently.
Acetate salts are produced by a deliberate ion exchange after purification. The exchange costs a processing step and is the reason acetate-form material is more expensive.
Reconciling gross mass to label claim
| Component | Typical share | Counted in purity? | Counted in content? |
|---|
| Target peptide | 88–94 % | Yes, as main peak | Yes |
| Related impurities | 1–3 % | Yes, as other peaks | No |
| Counter-ion (TFA or acetate) | 2–8 % | No | No |
| Residual water | 2–6 % | No | No |
| Bulking agent, if present | 0–40 % | No | No |
Concretely, peptides purified by reverse-phase chromatography with a trifluoroacetic acid mobile phase are isolated as trifluoroacetate salts. The trifluoroacetate content depends on the number of basic residues and can run from a few per cent to well over ten by mass on a heavily basic sequence.
Counter-ion content scales with the number of basic residues, following directly from charge balance.
Count the basic residues and you can estimate the counter-ion load.
edited 11 Nov 2024 by plate_count_9k — added a caveat about sampling
8Two of us submitted the same lot to different laboratories and got results a tenth apart. – forty_two_c 4 months ago Small correction: the limit of quantitation, not the limit of detection, is the relevant one there. – Dr_Tomas_Kral 5 months ago add a comment