Accepted answer
At 2 mg/mL every microlitre left behind is 2 µg, so a 50 µL hub costs 0.1 mg per draw and a 5 µL fixed-needle barrel costs 0.01 mg. Multiply by the draws, not by the doses: ten draws through a 50 µL dead space is 1 mg gone, which at 2 mg/mL is 0.5 mL of solution you paid for and never administered. Against a 2 mg dose that 50 µL is 5 per cent; against a 0.25 mg dose it is 40 per cent, which is why the loss matters most at exactly the doses where you can least afford it. a 30G needle has a bore, a hub and a length, and the hub dominates: a fixed-needle insulin barrel has almost none, a luer connection has a measurable one before the needle even starts.
To be exact about it, a fixed-needle insulin syringe holds roughly 3 to 5 µL dead space and costs the same as a luer-lock syringe with 35 to 100 µL dead space.
Draws available = 2000 / 102 = 19.6, so 19 full draws. Delivered peptide = 19 x 0.5 mg = 9.5 mg. Lost to dead space = 19 x 2 µL = 38 µL x 0.005 = 0.19 mg. Yield = 95 per cent.
Reading a lyophilised cake
| Appearance | Interpretation | Action |
|---|
| Intact opaque puck, proud of base | Cycle ran correctly | Proceed |
| Slumped to one side | Shipped before fully dry, or vibration | Usually usable; note it |
| Glassy translucent film | Collapse above glass transition | Test before use |
| Melt-back ring at stopper | Thermal excursion in transit | Test before use |
| No visible cake at all | Very low fill, or nothing there | Weigh it; query the supplier |
Mechanically, the luer cone of the syringe plus the needle's own plastic hub accounts for the vast majority of the dead space.
Published inter-laboratory comparisons of dead-space measurements on identical syringes show good agreement, suggesting the numbers are reliable.
The switch nearly doubles your vial, which is better than most other optimisations combined.